Publications
Sort & Filters
Filters
91 results
91 results
Timilsina, G., Cao, J., & Ho, M. (2018). Carbon tax for achieving China’s NDC: Simulations for some design features using a CGE model. Climate Change Economics, 9(3).
Timilsina, G., Cao, J., & Ho, M. (2018). Carbon tax for achieving China’s NDC: Simulations for some design features using a CGE model. Climate Change Economics, 9(3).
Guo, X., Ho, M., You, L., Cao, J., Fang, Y., Tu, T., & Hong, Y. (2018). Industrial water pollution discharge taxes in China: A Multi-sector dynamic analysis. Water, 10(12).
Guo, X., Ho, M., You, L., Cao, J., Fang, Y., Tu, T., & Hong, Y. (2018). Industrial water pollution discharge taxes in China: A Multi-sector dynamic analysis. Water, 10(12).
Ho, M. S., Wang, Z., & Yu, Z. (2017). China’s Power Generation Dispatch. Resources for the Future.
Ho, M. S., Wang, Z., & Yu, Z. (2017). China’s Power Generation Dispatch. Resources for the Future.
Timilsina, G., Ho, M., & Cao, J. (2017). World Bank Experience in Low-Carbon Investments and the Role of Carbon Pricing in China. In Globalization of Low-Carbon Technologies: The Impact of the Paris Agreement . Springer.
Timilsina, G., Ho, M., & Cao, J. (2017). World Bank Experience in Low-Carbon Investments and the Role of Carbon Pricing in China. In Globalization of Low-Carbon Technologies: The Impact of the Paris Agreement . Springer.
Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Samuels, J. D. (2016). The Impact of Information Technology on Post-War U.S. Growth. Telecommunications Policy, 40(5), 398-411.
Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Samuels, J. D. (2016). The Impact of Information Technology on Post-War U.S. Growth. Telecommunications Policy, 40(5), 398-411.
Cao, J., Ho, M. S., & Timilsina, G. R. (2016). Impacts of Carbon Pricing in Reducing the Carbon Intensity of China’s GDP.
Cao, J., Ho, M. S., & Timilsina, G. R. (2016). Impacts of Carbon Pricing in Reducing the Carbon Intensity of China’s GDP.
In contributing to global climate change mitigation efforts as agreed in Paris in 2015, China has set a target of reducing the carbon dioxide intensity of gross domestic product by 60-65 percent in 2030 compared with 2005 levels. Using a dynamic...
Cao, J., Ho, M. S., & Liang, H. (2016). Household Energy Demand in Urban China: Accounting for Regional Prices and Rapid Income Change. Energy Journal, 37(SI1), 87-110.
Cao, J., Ho, M. S., & Liang, H. (2016). Household Energy Demand in Urban China: Accounting for Regional Prices and Rapid Income Change. Energy Journal, 37(SI1), 87-110.
Ho, M. S. (2016). Commentary: Environmental Policy Issues in the “New Normal” Era of China. Resources, 192, 8-10.
Ho, M. S. (2016). Commentary: Environmental Policy Issues in the “New Normal” Era of China. Resources, 192, 8-10.
Ho, M. S., Jorgenson, D. W., & Samuels, J. D. (2015). Outlook for U.S. Economic Growth. Lessons from a Prototype Industry-level Production Account for the U.S. In Understanding the Growth Slowdown by Lindsey (ed.). Cato Institute.
Ho, M. S., Jorgenson, D. W., & Samuels, J. D. (2015). Outlook for U.S. Economic Growth. Lessons from a Prototype Industry-level Production Account for the U.S. In Understanding the Growth Slowdown by Lindsey (ed.). Cato Institute.
Goettle, R., Fawcett, A., Ho, M. S., Jorgenson, D. W., Smith, E., & Wilcoxen, P. (2015). Carbon Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States. National Tax Journal, 68(1), 121-138.
Goettle, R., Fawcett, A., Ho, M. S., Jorgenson, D. W., Smith, E., & Wilcoxen, P. (2015). Carbon Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States. National Tax Journal, 68(1), 121-138.
Ho, M. S., & Wang, Z. (2015). Green Growth for China? Resources, 188.
Ho, M. S., & Wang, Z. (2015). Green Growth for China? Resources, 188.
Ho, M. S., Jorgenson, D. W., & Samuels, J. D. (2014). What will revive U.S. Economic Growth? Lessons from a prototype industry-level production Account for the United States. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(4), 654-673.
Ho, M. S., Jorgenson, D. W., & Samuels, J. D. (2014). What will revive U.S. Economic Growth? Lessons from a prototype industry-level production Account for the United States. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(4), 654-673.